@article{ACS16815,
author = {Diyar Saeed and Evgenij Potapov and Antonio Loforte and Michiel Morshuis and David Schibilsky and Daniel Zimpfer and Julia Riebandt and Federico Pappalardo and Matteo Attisani and Mauro Rinaldi and Davide Pacini and Assad Haneya and Faiz Ramjankhan and Dirk W. Donker and Ulrich P. Jorde and Wolfgang Otto and Julia Stein and Dmytro Tsyganenko and Ameen Al-Naamani and Radi Wieloch and Rafael Ayala and Jochen Cremer and Michael Borger and Artur Lichtenberg and Jan Gummert},
title = {Impact of extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) cannulation strategy on outcome after durable mechanical circulation support system implantation on behalf of durable MCS after ECLS Study Group},
journal = {Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
year = {2021},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: The literature on outcomes of patients requiring durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) after extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of preoperative ECLS cannulation on postoperative outcome after durable MCS implantation.
Methods: The durable MCS after ECLS registry is a multicenter retrospective study that gathered data on consecutive patients who underwent durable MCS implantation after ECLS between January 2010 and August 2018 in eleven high volume European centers. Patients who underwent the implantation of total artificial heart, pulsatile pumps, or first-generation pumps after ECLS were excluded from the analysis. The remaining patients were divided into two groups; central ECLS group (cECLS) and peripheral ECLS group (pECLS). A 1:1 propensity score analysis was performed to identify two matched groups. The outcome of these two groups was compared.
Results: A total of 531 durable MCS after ECLS were implanted during this period. The ECLS cannulation site was peripheral in 87% (n=462) and central in 13% (n=69) of the patients. After excluding pulsatile pumps and total artificial heart patients, a total of 494 patients remained (pECLS =434 patients, cECLS =60 patients). A 1:1 propensity score analysis resulted in 2 matched groups (each 55 patients) with median age of 54 years (48–60 years) in cECLS group and 54 years (43–60 years) in pECLS group. HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was implanted in the majority of the patients (cECLS =71% vs. pECLS =76%, P=0.67). All postoperative morbidities were comparable between the groups. The thirty-day, one year and long-term survival was comparable between the groups (P=0.73).
Conclusions: The cannulation strategy of ECLS appears to have no impact on the post-operative outcome after durable MCS implantation.},
issn = {2304-1021}, url = {https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/16815}
}