@article{ACS16529,
author = {Andreas Koster and Edis Ljajikj and David Faraoni},
title = {Traditional and non-traditional anticoagulation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation},
journal = {Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
year = {2018},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the anticoagulant of choice during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Despite its favorable pharmacologic properties, management of heparin anticoagulation during ECMO remains a major challenge. To date, little is known about the optimal monitoring strategy or the heparin dose offering the best safety/efficacy profile. Therefore, it remains unclear if the heparin dose should be adapted to target a specific “clotting time” [e.g., activated clotting time (ACT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)] or a heparin concentration, measured by coagulation factor anti-Xa assay. In addition, no study has compared the relevance of modern viscoelastic coagulation tests over the single value of a clotting time or heparin concentration value. Although guidelines for anticoagulation during ECMO support have been published, the absence of evidence limits the quality of the recommendations provided, which explains the major intra- and inter-institutional variability observed. Large prospective multicenter trials are urgently needed to investigate the optimal anticoagulation management strategy during ECMO support.},
issn = {2304-1021}, url = {https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/16529}
}